Comments due by Oct 9, 2015
When Venezuelan Oil Minister Juan Pablo Pérez Alfonso resigned in 1963, he blasted the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, at the time torn by internal rivalries, for failing to produce any benefits for his country. Half a century later, OPEC is still split and Venezuela is again unhappy, this time at the unwillingness of the organization’s top producer, Saudi Arabia, to rescue oil prices from a six-year low that’s dragging the battered Venezuelan economy into an even deeper crisis.
On Sept. 10, Venezuela’s oil minister, Eulogio del Pino, tweeted appeals for OPEC and non-OPEC countries “to have a discussion on fair prices, minimum prices to ensure sustainability” and to “overcome our differences of opinion.” Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro said on Sept. 16 that he was making progress on organizing a summit of petroleum exporting countries to have that discussion. OPEC member Algeria is backing the Venezuela-proposed conference—as well as Maduro’s desire for a higher price. Venezuelan officials didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Maduro’s plans won’t pan out unless Saudi Arabia stops flooding the market. There’s no sign it’ll retreat from that strategy, which is helping it preserve and even gain market share. “OPEC is of no use today,” says former Algerian Prime Minister Ahmed Benbitour. “The war now is about market share, not price, and Algeria is getting no benefit from this organization.” OPEC declined to comment for this story.
Venezuela’s and Algeria’s complaints raise the question of why some members stay in OPEC if the Saudis call the shots and ignore pleas for higher prices. Neither Venezuela nor Algeria has made moves to quit. Not only is the group intact, but former member Indonesia is returning, boosting membership to 13 nations.
Disgruntled members “don’t leave because they still believe there could be something in the future where the group does make a decision” to boost prices and cut production, says Jamie Webster, an oil analyst at researcher IHS. “It’s much easier to just keep OPEC alive than to shut it down, and with it a key communication channel” among governments whose financial health depends largely on oil income.
Of the 1.7 trillion barrels that remain to be extracted worldwide, 1.2 trillion, or 70 percent, are controlled by OPEC’s current members. Venezuela and Saudi Arabia hold 18 percent and 16 percent, respectively, and Iran and Iraq 9 percent each, according to oil major BP. These four nations, with Kuwait, are OPEC’s founding members.

“Just look at the outlook for oil in the next 10, 20, 30 years. It is expected that OPEC countries will actually have to come up with most of the growth in supply to meet the demand,” says former OPEC Secretary General Adnan Shihab-Eldin of Kuwait. “If OPEC didn’t exist, it would be needed in the future much more than in the present or the past” to coordinate production and keep the world supplied.
Pricing has often been a bone of contention, with Algeria, Iran, Iraq, Libya, and Venezuela pushing for higher prices, a hawkish stand compared with Saudi Arabia and its neighbors Kuwait, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. “Venezuela’s position within OPEC is to pursue a strategy of low production and high prices, since they can’t attract investments” to boost output, says Carlos Rossi, president of Caracas-based consulting firm EnergyNomics. Gulf Arabs are more inclined to accept a lower price to keep consumers hooked on cheap gasoline and thus extend the Age of Oil. Saudi Arabia in particular is more likely to accept a lower price that preserves global growth and gives it influence far in excess of its actual economy. Says Ed Morse, Citigroup Global Markets managing director: “Saudi Arabia’s economy is the size of Illinois’s.” Yet the nation sits at the same table as China, Europe, Japan, and the U.S. thanks to its role as the major producer.
Instead of lowering output to prop up prices, as suggested by Algeria and Venezuela, Saudi Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi lobbied his OPEC counterparts in November 2014 not to yield market share to competing suppliers, including U.S. producers of shale oil. Crude sank and trades at about $50 a barrel, half its level a year ago. “What OPEC wanted to do is have a fresh look at the structural changes that have taken place in the oil market with the advent of U.S. shale and other producers, who at a very high price were able to bring in fresh supplies that far exceed what demand called for,” says Shihab-Eldin.
Algeria’s and Venezuela’s attempts to recruit non-OPEC producers in an effort to increase prices have been rejected by Russia and Mexico, two of the largest exporters outside the group. The Mexicans say their focus is on restoring the productivity of their biggest field. Russia says it doesn’t have the ability of some Persian Gulf producers to quickly raise or lower output because of the harsh winters and complex geology at its Siberian oil fields. “You cannot regulate productivity of Russian wells simply by turning a faucet,” Sergei Klubkov, exploration and production analyst at Moscow-based Vygon Consulting, said in an e-mail.
The International Energy Agency says Saudi Arabia is winning the fight for market share, driving higher-cost producers—for example, some U.S. shale companies—out of business. Non-OPEC supply is expected to fall in 2016 by the most in more than two decades as producers shut wells that can’t operate profitably with oil below $50 a barrel. Production outside OPEC will fall by 500,000 barrels a day, to 57.7 million, in 2016, the agency said on Sept. 11.
That’s no solace for those in OPEC who are hard-pressed for cash. Fresh supply is likely to hit the market from Iran next year, when the oil export ban is lifted as a result of the July agreement with the U.S. and the other Western powers restricting its nuclear program. Oil prices could drop to as low as $20 a barrel, Goldman Sachs said on Sept. 11.
Saudi Arabia’s production of about 10.5 million barrels a day is its highest ever, and the kingdom still has spare capacity of more than a million barrels. Other OPEC members are pumping less oil as projects to bring fresh crude to the market were derailed or delayed by political or social unrest. Venezuela is producing 2.5 million barrels a day, vs. a peak of 3.7 million in 1970. Algeria and Nigeria are in similar straits.
Those three nations, plus Iraq and Libya, are the OPEC members most vulnerable to political turmoil as cheap oil hammers their currencies and weakens their ability to sustain social subsidies. Venezuela “appears poised for a near-term crisis” amid protests and shortages of basic goods as December’s parliamentary elections get closer, analysts Christopher Louney and Helima Croft of the Royal Bank of Canada said in an August report on OPEC’s “fragile five.”
“OPEC is like a family where the children quarrel but can’t do without each other,” says Karin Kneissl, a Vienna-based university lecturer on energy politics and author ofEnergy Poker. “They know they are better off talking to each other to preserve the common, long-term interest; even those who left long to return if they can.”
Indonesia voluntarily suspended its OPEC membership in 2009 as its production declined to the point that it had to import oil. Indonesia still pumps oil for its domestic market. It will return officially on Dec. 4 as the first member that isn’t a net oil exporter. As OPEC’s only member in East Asia, Indonesia could help strengthen the group’s ties in the region, where oil demand is strongest, said Indonesian Energy Minister Sudirman Said in June. As both oil consumer and producer, it will help OPEC bridge the divide between the two groups, he said.
“The benefits from staying with the group outweigh by far the cost of membership,” says Hasan Qabazard, chief executive officer of Kuwait Catalyst and former head of research at OPEC. “Getting firsthand access to market data, research, and information that may affect the market” could be “the motivation behind Indonesia’s application” to return.
“I don’t see OPEC falling apart,” says Fayyad Al-Nima, Iraq’s deputy oil minister for extraction. And Venezuela’s reason for sticking with the group? Says Carl Larry, head of oil and gas for market researcher Frost & Sullivan: “It’s either stay with OPEC and tag along or leave OPEC and be by yourself.”
The bottom line: Saudi Arabia manages to impose its will on other members of OPEC, thanks to its ability to flood the market.
I agree with what Jamie Webster, the oil analyst researcher at IHS said, “It’s much easier to just keep OPEC alive than to shut it down, and with it a key communication channel." As crazy and as unwilling as some of these countries are when it comes to OPEC, shutting it down does not seem plausible and reasonable to shut down OPEC just because of Saudi Arabia being able to flood the market. With Saudi Arabia flooding the market,the prices are all dropping undesirably and the other nations are not able to make the same type of profit that they hope/expect to. These huge quantities that are being sold by Saudi Arabia, put huge pressure on the other countries trying to get into this market. Former Algerian Prime Minister Ahmed Benbitour said “The war now is about market share, not price." He is arguing that none of these other countries can effectively and efficiently get into this market because of Saudi Arabia and its market flooding.
ReplyDeleteIt almost seems like OPEC is a monopoly in regards to OPEC
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jamie webster as well, OPEC should not be shut down mainly due to the fact that regardless what the price is for oil, it is a necessity in today's society and can still draw money regardless of Saudi Arabia flooding the market. However, the prices of OPEC oil have significantly dropped due to Saudi Arabia.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jamie webster that we need OPEC, But i feel that in order for it to OPEC to continue to be around they need to learn how to work as one. Since Saudi Arabia has been flooding the market with extra oil and prices have fallen they are the only country that is realizing maximum profits. For OPEC to continue to function properly, they need to have a stronger set of rues or board members that can control each country and how much they produce. I feel that if they can all work as one and settle on one price and one set quantity they will be able to maximize efficiency
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jamie Webster, OPEC is a very important company yet they are not being the company that they should be. The main reason for the company is to provide oil for the future. Although there will be other sources of energy, im sure we will still use oil within the next couple of decades. “Just look at the outlook for oil in the next 10, 20, 30 years. It is expected that OPEC countries will actually have to come up with most of the growth in supply to meet the demand,” says former OPEC Secretary General Adnan Shihab-Eldin of Kuwait. If Saudia Arabia stops flooding the market, it is still no guaranteed to preserve and even gain market share. That is why I believe the OPEC should be implemented and re-evaluated for use. They just need a new set of rules for the board members to follow in order to implement a fair price.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jamie Webster when he says we need OPEC. The only reason there is doubt is because OPEC, although an important company, is lacking in the aspects of production and creditability. OPEC needs to learn to how to work as a whole in order to be successful in their goals that lay in the future. Saudi Arabia's production of oil barrels is at the highest its ever been, so if OPEC can establish better rules based on fair prices then all the members of the OPEC can find a set price and quantity that allows the members to work as a whole and be more efficient. With a solid effort and more established rules Saudi Arabia will hopefully stop flooding the markets, which will then allow OPEC to move forward towards a better future with a fair price on oil barrels.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately for countries like Venezuela, the Saudi Arabians are flooding the oil market with incredible production, keeping the price of oil at the lowest it has been in the last years. This has become a major issue for many other members of the OPEC who cant make a profit for the amount of oil they produce at such a low price. However, the OPEC has done nothing to control the production of the Saudis who have continued out-produce and amass more market share than any other country. Even though the OPEC remains inactive, I don’t think it would be practical for countries like Venezuela to leave because of the high possibility of the need for action in the future. At some point the OPEC will have to cut production and boost prices and these struggling countries will just have to deal with it in the meantime. I like the Venezuelan’s attempt to get the worlds largest exporters outside of the OPEC to raise their prices. This, in theory, would level the playing field for Venezuela however it is not practical and just not possible for Russia and Mexico at this time to do so. Although the smaller members of the OPEC are experiencing much political and domestic turmoil right now due to the falling oil prices, it is best for their long-term interest to stay with the organization.
ReplyDeleteRiley Iafrate
I found this article very interesting. You get to see what is currently going on in the OPEC and what are their differences as of now. Venezuela is in a deeper crisis because they aren't making money which is why they want to raise the price on barrels but Saudi Arabia is making money from the $50 barrels. Throughout the blog you see that clearly Saudi Arabia is in charge and has a higher power when it comes to changing the price and so on. The article also shows you how the barrel price still might even drop which is not good for all of them. Like Indonesia in 2009 had to suspend their account because they weren't making enough oil and even had to began importing oil. Saudi Arabia is winning in this situation by exporting so many barrels a day (10.5 million) as stated in article. While the other OPEC countries are only estimated at about 2.5 million a day. You can really see the difference through this. Although right now seems as though they are in a crisis the article shows that it is better to stay with OPEC in the long run as it will eventually get better there is no losing in their situation. They get first hand access to market data which is a good thing to hang. So my suggestion is that Venezuela and Algeria stick it out.
ReplyDeleteBianca Springer
This article is very interesting and extremely significant to everyone in the world. It is good to stay up to date on OPEC and to try and predict the future of the oil monopoly. There is something that has to be done to help Venezuela and their economy. By Saudi Arabia lowering the price of oil by the barrel is it killing the Venezuela economy. I don't believe we should end OPEC because it would be easier to just adjust the group. It's hard to believe how the oil price might even drop to 20$ a barrel. For the companies depending on the money from the oil that could completely destroy their economy. But for the person filling up their car every week with oil to get to work that doesn't sound so bad. There is something that has to be done to make Saudi Arabia pick a reasonable price for the barrel of oil.
ReplyDeleteAs you can see, based on the chart in this article the price of crude oil has been dropping tremendously. Oil prices began to change as the impact of increased production from non-OPEC countries is felt. This got really bad, and soon, as the prices dropped, Saudi Arabia increased production to gain market share. So as price of crude oil drops something else increases. This is an incredible thing for Saudi Arabia but this is now becoming a huge problem for people of the OPEC who can not make profits on the oil they produce for a low price. If OPEC would work out its differences with Saudi Arabia and Venezuela's oil production they wont be in the biggest slump that they are in right now. The OPEC is a necessity in order to help everyone out in the long run but what we see in this article is that they are not working towards anything. By saying this I agree with what Jamie Webster is saying.
ReplyDeleteThe Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries are in trouble and trying to rescue their economies by finding a fair oil price to agree on with Saudi Arabia. These economies depended very strongly on oil income. Saudi Arabia is continuously unwilling to rescue the oil prices from a six year low. Some believe that it's about market share rather the price and that OPEC is no use for today. But OPEC has actually grown since regaining Indonesia. Jamie Webster adds that "its much easier to just keep OPEC alive than to shut down, and with it a key communication live." Venezuela and Algeria have attempted to recruit countries such as Russia and Mexico in order to increase prices but they both declined. So the OPEC countries continue to search for reduction in production in order to increase the price of oil. Saudi Arabia preserves global growth because they are likely to accept a lower price. This hurts the United States shale companies.
ReplyDeleteBradley Paterson
Jamie Webster does bring up some good points. OPEC should focus more on being an efficient company in the long run because in the next few decades, there's no telling how scarce oil will be. Every day, billions of oil tanks are being used throughout the world because there are an infinite amount of assets that make use of oil. However it should not be taken granted because everyone, especially those who own cars or work in factories, is reliant on oil and have not adapted to live without it.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jamie Webster (oil analyst researcher at IHS). Since The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has concerns with rescuing their economies by finding a fair oil price to agree on with Saudi Arabia, shutting it down doesn’t seem sensible. The prices are dropping rapidly and the other nations are not able to make the same profit that they would like to. These massive amount of quantities that are being sold by Saudi Arabia, pressure the other countries on trying to getting involved in the market. Even though OPEC has actually grown since regaining Indonesia. Venezuela and Algeria have attempted to recruit countries such as Russia and Mexico in order to increase prices, but they both declined. So the OPEC countries continue to search for reduction in production in order to increase the price of oil. Ultimately the OPEC is a necessity in order to help everyone out in the long run, just like Jamie Webster states “…it’s much easier to just keep OPEC alive than to shut down, and with it a key communication live.”
ReplyDeleteThis article about OPEC is very interesting. I have also read elsewhere that the Saudi's are flooding the market to lower the price. They are lowering the price per barrel of oil because the Saudi's feel threatened by the increase in U.S. shale and fracking industry. The reason for this is that the U.S. oil industry could now be a threat to OPEC and the Saudi's, which in turn could ruin their "monopoly" on oil. Since the Saudi's are lowering the price per barrel this would put out of business any companies that cannot produce oil for that low price and make a profit. On the topic of OPEC falling apart, I believe that they will not fall apart. With the vast supply Saudi Arabia has and the their cheap cost of production they are able to take a small hit on their profits in the short term but are looking at the longer picture of eliminating as many of their competitors as possible. A more important matter regarding this oil standoff is what Russia is doing? Russia's main economic sources is their natural gas and oil. This low cost per barrel of oil is really hurting their economy and is making Putin make some decisions. One of these decisions is to intervene in Syria. Putin is helping out in Syria because he needs who ever is in charge in Syria to be his puppet. He needs Syria because he is now able to place warships and aircraft in the port and airfield on the cost of Syria on the Mediterranean. With this movement I believe that he will put up a blockade at the mouth of the Suez Canal and prevent any oil shipments from getting to European markets and thus will cause chaos which will result in sky rocketing oil and LNG prices.
ReplyDeleteNicholas Swyntuch
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jamie Webster in the matter that OPEC should stay around. We do need it to stay around but changes must be made because countries such as Saudi Arabia can't go setting prices wherever they want and flourishing at the expense of a country such as Venezuela.The company needs to work as one to set prices at a reasonable place that way no one comes near a crisis like Venezuela is. If the OPEC can make these changes I believe the company will run a lot more efficiently.
ReplyDeleteMike Salmonese
Economically what Saudi Arabia has been doing to the oil market makes sense. They are trying to control the market with cheap prices to drive out competitors. In other words, they are in theory creating a monopoly. Oil production in areas like the U.S have dropped dramatically because the cost of extracting oil now outweighs the profit that could be made. It seems like Saudi Arabia will wait until their is such few providers other then themselves, and then the raise their prices to increase prices. What may sound economical does not always constitute for ethics, and it seems like Saudi Arabia is disregarding the world economic affect from their control of the market. Venezuela economy relies heavily on oil production and the future is not promising for them right now.
ReplyDeleteAfter reading this article it seems like a classic case of monopolization that the United States went through over a century ago. Saudi Arabia is singlehandly destroying the economies of countries such at Venezuela by flooding the market with their oil. The very purpose of the OPEC is to try and aid the smaller countries in a way to protect themselves from the larger suppliers. However, this obviously hasnt worked indicated by Saudi Arabia Controlling the actions of the other OPEC members by having such a large share of oil and have the ability to flood the market with oil drastically dropping the price of oil. For countries such as the United States this is a fantastic thing as we import almost all of our oil that we consume on a daily basis and this will aid us in balancing our dept out due to the massive inbalance between our imports and exports. However, for the countries significantly hurting from the price drop such as Venezuela something needs to be done in regards to OPEC. The organization cannot fall apart as the same flooding will occur by Saudi Arabia but power needs to be given to these other countries to prevent economic disaster.
ReplyDeleteChristopher Carapola
The OPEC should stay around for the long run to prevent the use of monopolization. Countries like Venezuala are changing their oil prices lower to defeat their competitors. Saudia Arabia on the other hand is dominating with the oil competition. If the OPEC can help maintain the competition and stop monopolies from Saudia Arabia and Russia or Mexico, then positive change in the future will come.
ReplyDelete