The risks of the Federal Reserve moving too quickly or too slowly are nearly balanced, New York Fed President William Dudley said Thursday, pointing to a rate hike on the horizon.Dudley, a voting member of the Fed and vice chairman of the Federal Open Market Committee, emphasized, however, that a December liftoff depends on incoming data. Echoing comments from his colleagues, he said that the pace of tightening will be "quite gradual" once the Fed begins raising rates.The central banker said the strong October jobs report should "partially put to rest" concerns that the U.S. labor market might be faltering, adding that the country is much closer to maximum employment than it was at the start of the year.Some labor slack remains, Dudley said, explaining that he has still not seen compelling evidence that the tightening jobs market is leading to more rapid compensation gains.
Dudley also addressed earlier concerns that global economics could impact the Fed's decision, saying the international outlook appears less problematic than it did a few months ago.
On the inflation front, the New York Fed president said that, if the economy continues on its above-trend pace, then worries about low inflation should begin to recede. Core inflation, he added, should rise once transitory factors dissipate.
Dudley said he thought the fundamentals supporting U.S. domestic demand look "quite sturdy" and the housing fundamentals are solid. He did predict, however, that the trade sector will probably continue to drag on growth in 2016.
Chicago Fed President Charles Evans also spoke Thursday, saying the central bank is close to reaching its employment target, but it could be "well into" next year before the goal for inflation is reached to support a rate hike.
Once the Fed initiates liftoff, he said, an appropriate strategy would be to raise the target rate gradually.
Evans is a voting member of the FOMC, which meets next month to decide on whether to raise interest rates for the first time in nine years.
In remarks prepared for delivery to the Manufactured Housing Institute in Chicago, Evans said it could be well into next year before headwinds from lower energy prices and a stronger dollar dissipate enough to allow for sustained upward moment in core inflation.
"The outlook for inflation remains too low," he said. "A gradual path of normalization would balance both the various risks to my projections for the economy's most likely path and the costs that would be involved in mitigating those risks."
"It has been dumbfounding to me," Evans later reporters after his speech, of how little the inflation outlook has changed over the past several years, even as the U.S. economy has strengthened.
While Evans expects U.S. growth of about 2.5 percent in the next 1½ years, he said housing is one part of the economy that still has a good way to go. Progress in that area, he said, has been slow and uneven.
On the other side of the equation, St. Louis Fed President James Bullard said Thursday the Federal Reserve's unemployment andinflation goals have been met, and there is no reason to continue to "experiment" with policy extremes.
Bullard, in prepared remarks, said the near-zero interest-rate policy has put the U.S. economy at "considerable risk of future inflation."
Fed Chair Janet Yellen also spoke Thursday, although she did not comment on the outlook for the U.S. economy or her thoughts on monetary policy decisions.
Yellen, kicking off a research conference on policy transmission and implementation after the 2007-2009 financial crisis, said the central bank must weigh the effects of post-crisis financial regulations and new channels through which policy affects markets as it prepares to raise interest rates. She added that the Fed must also weigh the disadvantages of its actions in light of new tools meant to help the Fed raise rates.
Comments by Nov. 20, 2015
Fed "policymakers should be mindful of new channels for monetary policy transmission that may have emerged from the intricate economic and financial linkages in our global economy that were revealed by the crisis," she said in prepared remarks.
"It is crucial to understand the effect of regulations and possible changes in financial intermediation on monetary policy implementation and transmission," Yellen added.
Richmond Fed President Jeffrey Lacker also spoke Thursday, saying he continues to hold the view that monetary policy has the unique ability to determine inflation over time. Still, he said, caution should apply to the notion that policy should respond to signals of incipient financial instability.
Monetary policy's ability to affect real economic activity can be quite limited and is almost always short-lived when well-executed, he said.
The rate hike has been stymied in part by low inflation that continues to run below the Fed's 2 percent target rate, and some policymakers have advocated waiting for more signs that inflation will rise before embarking on a path of monetary tightening.
Lacker, who has twice voted this year to raise rates when the rest of his colleagues decided to stay put, said the recent behavior of inflation "does not warrant such pessimism." But he added that the credibility of such an inflation goal "depends on the public's belief that the central bank has and will use the tools necessary to make inflation return to its goal, should that become necessary." (Reuters)
The issue of inflation is becoming more of a controversial issue now that a raise is in the works but their is still a lot of support to keep the rate at the same low number. Different states have different economics and some states aren't ready for a hike due to their unmet goals. The Fed really must consider the negative effects of a raise as well to avoid the risk of hurting the economy in the long run.
ReplyDeleteI view the issue of raising the interest rate from both sides. Bullard states that the "near-zero interest-rate policy has increased the risk of future inflation" which makes sense because the government is currently not earning sufficient income, which can hurt them at a later period. In the future, our nation will struggle with a non-existent rate of interest since long-term assets can't be utilized over time without consequences to consider. However, the increase in the interest rate can't be too high, otherwise fewer investments will be made, which will burn companies over time. Loans will also be more prevalent in the future, especially to those who are already in financial crises. So to conclude, the interest rate shouldn't go through a vast change. I think a small increase can satisfy both sides since people won't be paying that much more while the government will have gradual increases in revenue. Let's hope by December, the FOMC and the Federal Reserve will make the right decision.
ReplyDeleteI don't believe that interest rates should change in any drastic way. Unless it is a minor change where both sides will have somewhat of a benefit. However, a minor change might be more of a reasonable decision. We would not be paying too much more money, and it will also increase the revenue of the government. If the interest rates increase too much there won't be as many investments which will cut down spending and eventually cause a decline in businesses. I think the FOMC and Federal Reserve have a lot to think about but they should know that raising interest rates too high will do no good.
ReplyDeleteI believe that a slight raise in interest rates will allow for our country to prosper a little more. With the current policies we have in place our economy is slowly growing and on the verge of a recession in some economists eyes, but i believe that a raise in interest rates will no really hard the economy. If the raise in interest rates is low i believe that it will have no negative effects at all on the overall and might stimulate more growth in the economy. The issue of low inflation rates will be fixed over time I feel. As more money is printed of is flowing into the country will allow for the inflation to rise. With a slight raise in the interest rates it might allow for the government or credit unions to loan more money allowing for a greater amount of money to be entered into the economy. The raise in interest rates however cannot be to high, this is why i feel the fed has no made a decision i feel that they do not know how much to raise the rates by and i feel that if it is too much it will cause a major decline in investments and therefore a shrinkage in the economy
ReplyDeleteMy view on the Federal Reserve raising interest rates depends on how much the rates are raised. If the there is a minimal amount of raising then it might not be bad for the economy but it could effect the businesses in the aspect of investments. However, if the Federal Reserve raises the interest rates high then it would be a problem for the entire economy. The higher the interest rates the less people are going to invest. I believe that the Federal Reserve should not raise the interest rates.
ReplyDeleteI believe that the Federal Reserve should take into account what will happen if they drastically increase interest rates. Like stated in the article, "It is crucial to understand the effect of regulations and possible changes in financial intermediation on monetary policy implementation and transmission." The rate banks charge each other for short-term loans - affects other short term rates paid by firms and households. This effects long-term rates, including mortgages. Changes in long-term rates will have an influence on asset prices. If the federal reserve increase interest rates now it wont benefit anyone in the long run.
ReplyDeleteIf the economy is growing at a steady rate ( 2.5% increase in the next 1.5 years) and we have met our inflation and employment goals, why rock the boat?
ReplyDeleteIs it possible to keep things the way they are? Evans has addressed that the housing market still has a long way to go. so we are clearly still working on improving the US economy. If we are going to raise interest rates, then I believe the increase should be very small. Too much of a movement may through off the balance we currently have.
Thank you,
Ashley
The question of the article is "Will They or Wont they". This question is regarding the issue of whether or not the Fed should raise the Fed rate. There are many factors that are going to decide whether or not the rate will be raised. One factor that is important to decide about raising the rate is unemployment. The current unemployment rate is at around 5%, which is a good number to support a Fed rate hike. Another indicator that is influencing the decision of raising the rate is inflation. The inflation currently is too low for the Fed to raise the rate. One other economic indicator that should effect the decision on raising the Fed rate is GDP. GDP shows how much economic growth there is in the country. The 3rd quarter GDP growth is at 1.5%. If GDP is that low that means there is not much growth going on. If some people believe this extremely low GDP number doesn’t prove anything then there is another article that shows that the economy is not doing as good as everyone makes it seem. There was a report in the WSJ that imports are down 10% in the months of August to October, which is the lowest it has been in almost a decade. This is a critical time for the upcoming holiday retail sales. This indicates that there are low sales expectations. So, the real question is whether or not the decision to raise the rate is based on economic indicators or is it more politically influenced.
ReplyDeleteNicholas Swyntuch
Monetary policies and decisions are crucial to getting the most out of our free market economy. After 9 years of monetary experiments and extremes, many experts believe that our goals of unemployment and inflation have been met, and they might possibly push for higher interest rates. Evidently, it might be time to raise rates but experts want to be positive that the current state of the economy will handle the change appropriately. When there is a clear consensus that the economy can handle an increase in interest rates the decision will be made, unfortunately I don't think this will be the case for next month.
ReplyDeleteIncreasing interest rates can be either good or bad. They shouldn't be raised all that much, just to avoid there being too many negative effects. Too much change can effect our economy to the point of affecting millions of people. Whether we want to bring that much change is the question. Sometimes it's really not worth it to put everyone at risk when only a few states are ready for change.
ReplyDelete